On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:08:51 -0400, Chick Tower wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:46:07 -0500, Dan C wrote:
>
>> OK..... trying to keep the word-twisting straight here.... Yes.
>> Right. An association between you and female would be incorrect, so
>> that makes you a non-female. Right? ;?
>
> Correct.

probably not, or you mean that you're an 'it' and not a '[s]he',
count down your type, a male is a female with a slight abberation
of a gene caused by an overdose of SRY protein ;-)

in short for Dr C. there's no such thing as 'non-female' for
mammalians (as I supposed Chick, you and me were :D)