![]() |
|
|
Welcome to the { mindfrost82.com } forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
3 Suggestions for flexible zooming in MSIE
In many respects I prefer MSIE 7's zoom feature over Firefox 2's, depending
on which website I'm viewing. I have 3 suggestions to provide more flexibility in the MSIE zoom feature, to make MSIE more compatible with aging eyes: 1. Options to set zoom to 5%, 10% increments, not just the current 25%. Firefox 2's 10% increments allow size to be increased adequately for my aging eyes, without requiring much horizontal scrolling. 2. Zoom "text only" with alt-mouse wheel. Again, the idea is to zoom but keep horizontal scrolling to the minimum. In many web pages, the images are merely decorative. In many other pages, clicking the image opens a large version of the image. 3. The ability to invert the mouse wheel zoom so it conforms with other applications I use. ------ Zooming is an important feature to those of us with aging eyes. Glasses, bifocals and continuous vision lenses don't fully correct our vision. Zooming the type is a much easier solution. With aging eyes, presbyopia, the eye doesn't change focus easily -- so we need different prescriptions depending on the distance from our eyes to what we are looking at. With multi-focus lenses (tri-focal, and continuous vision), different parts of the lense have different prescriptions. Adjusting focus means moving our heads around so we are looking through the part of the lense that has the right prescription -- a cumbersome solution. When it is possible to just to make the type bigger, that is generally the superior solution. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...orer. general |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|