I have encountered a problem with the synchronisation between my handheld HP
iPAQ h2200 and desktop running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) via Microsoft
ActiveSync 3.7.1 (build 3244). When trying to synch, a large (1000+) number
of calendar events were reported as not being synched. I asked the program
to do so, but it came back with a number of items to resolve. All were
calendar events involving people who are no longer with the company. It
appears likely that the desktop was offline when attempting the first
synchronisation. I also have a number of calendar events duplicated. One
event is as expected, the duplicate has the same content but lists me as the
organiser and only attendee.

Can anyone suggest an approach to bring everything back in line again ?

TIA
John.

Hi,
ActiveSync expects that everyone invited to a meeting is in your contacts.
At this point there is no fix for it.

Also, Outlook 2000 is no longer supported with the latest version of
ActiveSync or WMDC so be careful upgrading.

--
Chris De Herrera
http://www.pocketpcfaq.com
http://www.pocketpctalk.com
http://www.tabletpctalk.com
http://www.mobilitytalk.com




"John" <John@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7ED12385-B706-41AA-BFC3-AF4DFBB5C7A5@microsoft.com...
>
> I have encountered a problem with the synchronisation between my handheld
> HP
> iPAQ h2200 and desktop running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) via Microsoft
> ActiveSync 3.7.1 (build 3244). When trying to synch, a large (1000+)
> number
> of calendar events were reported as not being synched. I asked the
> program
> to do so, but it came back with a number of items to resolve. All were
> calendar events involving people who are no longer with the company. It
> appears likely that the desktop was offline when attempting the first
> synchronisation. I also have a number of calendar events duplicated. One
> event is as expected, the duplicate has the same content but lists me as
> the
> organiser and only attendee.
>
> Can anyone suggest an approach to bring everything back in line again ?
>
> TIA
> John.
>