![]() |
|
|
Welcome to the { mindfrost82.com } forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
ISA Svr and Terminal Server
I am looking for some best practices advice please.
We currently have to replace our ISA Svr box with new hardware. At the moment this box only does this plus WSUS and virus management. Basically nothing. However the organisation is about to install a TS server to service about 60+ remote users. Originally we were going to place a second box behind the ISA server to do this but wondered if the TS workload could go on the ISA box to save on hardware? So the question is: would it be ok to combine TS and ISA on the same box or should we stick to the original plan of TS behind ISA? What do other people do here? Thanks, Geoff Schaller Software Objectives |
|
|||
|
Re: ISA Svr and Terminal Server
Hello Geoff,
ISA server should always run as a dedicated machine to built the wall between internet and internal network. Choose additional hardware for TS. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > I am looking for some best practices advice please. > > We currently have to replace our ISA Svr box with new hardware. At the > moment this box only does this plus WSUS and virus management. > Basically nothing. However the organisation is about to install a TS > server to service about 60+ remote users. Originally we were going to > place a second box behind the ISA server to do this but wondered if > the TS workload could go on the ISA box to save on hardware? > > So the question is: would it be ok to combine TS and ISA on the same > box or should we stick to the original plan of TS behind ISA? What do > other people do here? > > Thanks, > > Geoff Schaller > Software Objectives |
|
|||
|
Re: ISA Svr and Terminal Server
Ok, thanks.
"Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message news:ff16fb66986c48ca7cdcddb7fbc3@msnews.microsoft .com: > Hello Geoff, > > ISA server should always run as a dedicated machine to built the wall between > internet and internal network. Choose additional hardware for TS. > > Best regards |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|