Hello MrMako,

Better post to:
microsoft.public.windows.server.update_services

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

> We are running WSUS 2.0 SP1 (Build 2.0.0.2620) on a Windows 2003 SP2
> Server. We have not moved to 3.0 yet, but plan to in the future. We
> have begun introducing Windows Server 2008 64 bit to our domain and I
> noticed today that they are identified in WSUS as 64-bit version of
> Windows Vista under Operating system.
>
> Since they share the same kernel I thought maybe this was just a
> mislabeling such as seeing "Longhorn" once in awhile, but it still
> seemed very odd since the patches are labeled Windows Server 2008. I
> checked the critical updates for 2008 and none have installed. I
> checked the servers and none are waiting to install. So I believe
> since it has misidentified the OS it does not know to send the right
> patches.
>
> I did not see much in Google and not sure if I might need a patch or
> something for this. Does anyone know if this is fixable in WSUS 2.0? I
> know it works in 3.0, but not ready to just throw that up quite yet.
> Thanks.
>

Thanks. Hard to find in web browser, but I found another post you answered on
how to get there.

"Meinolf Weber" wrote:

> Hello MrMako,
>
> Better post to:
> microsoft.public.windows.server.update_services
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
> > We are running WSUS 2.0 SP1 (Build 2.0.0.2620) on a Windows 2003 SP2
> > Server. We have not moved to 3.0 yet, but plan to in the future. We
> > have begun introducing Windows Server 2008 64 bit to our domain and I
> > noticed today that they are identified in WSUS as 64-bit version of
> > Windows Vista under Operating system.
> >
> > Since they share the same kernel I thought maybe this was just a
> > mislabeling such as seeing "Longhorn" once in awhile, but it still
> > seemed very odd since the patches are labeled Windows Server 2008. I
> > checked the critical updates for 2008 and none have installed. I
> > checked the servers and none are waiting to install. So I believe
> > since it has misidentified the OS it does not know to send the right
> > patches.
> >
> > I did not see much in Google and not sure if I might need a patch or
> > something for this. Does anyone know if this is fixable in WSUS 2.0? I
> > know it works in 3.0, but not ready to just throw that up quite yet.
> > Thanks.
> >
>
>
>