![]() |
|
|
Welcome to the { mindfrost82.com } forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Spell Checker
HI Bob,
Not only do I have a sp*i*ll Checker for OE, but I also have on for dialogs and forms one might fill our inIE! They both do pretty good jobs, but even with those, I have a hard time getting my fingers to go where the are supposed to. Even my long diatribe took 45 minutes to edit with the spell checker. I used to be able to touch tyoe {(35wpm), but those days are gone for now--strictly hunt and pack. I'm confident they are good checkers, and it's simply just me. Anyone interested in them, they are both free, and are complete stand-alones w/p MS Word for example. Thank you all for not taking my temper too seriously, as it wasn't mentioned towards anyone in particular. I was made that mistake, and will never forget it. Sometimes I can be rather (understatement) stupid. Bob I, keep up the great support as Tom Willet does! -- Sheepishly, Curt http://dundats.mvps.org/ http://dundats.proboards27.com/index.cgi http://www.aumha.org/ |
|
|||
|
Re: Spell Checker
???
Curt Christianson wrote: > HI Bob, > > Not only do I have a sp*i*ll Checker for OE, but I also have on for > dialogs > and forms one might fill our inIE! They both do pretty good jobs, but > even > with those, I have a hard time getting my fingers to go where the are > supposed to. > > Even my long diatribe took 45 minutes to edit with the spell checker. > > I used to be able to touch tyoe {(35wpm), but those days are gone for > now--strictly hunt and pack. I'm confident they are good checkers, and > it's > simply just me. > > Anyone interested in them, they are both free, and are complete > stand-alones > w/p MS Word for example. > > Thank you all for not taking my temper too seriously, as it wasn't > mentioned > towards anyone in particular. I was made that mistake, and will never > forget it. Sometimes I can be rather (understatement) stupid. > > Bob I, keep up the great support as Tom Willet does! |
|
|||
|
Re: Spell Checker
On Jan 18, 8:14*am, "Curt Christianson"
<curtchrist...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote: > * * HI Bob, > > Not only do I have a sp*i*ll Checker for OE, but I also have on for dialogs > and forms one might fill our inIE! *They both do pretty good jobs, but even > with those, I have a hard time getting my fingers to go where the are > supposed to. > > Even my long diatribe took 45 minutes to edit with the spell checker. > > I used to be able to touch tyoe {(35wpm), but those days are gone for > now--strictly hunt and pack. *I'm confident they are good checkers, and it's > simply just me. > > Anyone interested in them, they are both free, and are complete stand-alones > w/p MS Word for example. > > Thank you all for not taking my temper too seriously, as it wasn't mentioned > towards anyone in particular. *I was made that mistake, and will never > forget it. *Sometimes I can be rather (understatement) stupid. > > Bob I, keep up the great support as Tom Willet does! > > -- > Sheepishly, > > Curt > > http://dundats.mvps.org/http://dunda...ww..aumha.org/ http://www.spellcheck.net/ |
|
|||
|
Re: Spell Checker
Thanks Bear,
Got rid of the old sig. -- HTH, Curt http://dundats.mvps.org/ http://www.aumha.org/ "Michael Yardley" <middleton@mail.org> wrote in message news:2fa93205-7946-42d7-b236-2cfe4ec5d192@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Jan 18, 8:14 am, "Curt Christianson" <curtchrist...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote: > HI Bob, > > Not only do I have a sp*i*ll Checker for OE, but I also have on for > dialogs > and forms one might fill our inIE! They both do pretty good jobs, but even > with those, I have a hard time getting my fingers to go where the are > supposed to. > > Even my long diatribe took 45 minutes to edit with the spell checker. > > I used to be able to touch tyoe {(35wpm), but those days are gone for > now--strictly hunt and pack. I'm confident they are good checkers, and > it's > simply just me. > > Anyone interested in them, they are both free, and are complete > stand-alones > w/p MS Word for example. > > Thank you all for not taking my temper too seriously, as it wasn't > mentioned > towards anyone in particular. I was made that mistake, and will never > forget it. Sometimes I can be rather (understatement) stupid. > > Bob I, keep up the great support as Tom Willet does! > > -- > Sheepishly, > > Curt > > http://dundats.mvps.org/http://dunda...www.aumha.org/ http://www.spellcheck.net/ |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|