 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the { mindfrost82.com } forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
08-29-2008, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: document encoding
Thanks for your prompt reply, that would be the obvious answer!
But if I change it to a different encoding on the DWT this will change all of the pages that are created with it (about 60) and involve masses of changes to the HTML to enable them to validate again. This seems like two steps forward to get the two pages out of 96 to validate and 60 back, I'm not prepared to do that; I would prefer to have these two pages not validate, although they pass the basic validation routine for good HTML! 
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
