![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets
flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). I've added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to display images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen or so newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that gets flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have some other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it deserves? |
|
|||
|
Re: Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
LuDean Marvin keyboarded, On 7/22/2008 6:30 AM :
> Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets > flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). I've > added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to display > images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen or so > newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that gets > flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have some > other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it > deserves? Those actions have nothing to do with how the Scam code works. It deals with mismatches between the From Header and the source server. Most Users end up turning the feature off for the reasons your seeing. It is not robust enough code to not through false positives for trusted senders. -- Ron K. Who is General Failure, and why is he searching my HDD? Kernel Restore reported Major Error used BSOD to msg the enemy! |
|
|||
|
Re: Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
LuDean Marvin wrote:
> Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets > flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). I've > added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to display > images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen or so > newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that gets > flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have some > other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it deserves? The SCAM feature is another simple thing Everytime a message is opened (Yes Virginia, every time) the message is scanned for two things One is for numeric IPs instead of 'language' ones i.e. 12.123.123.12 instead of www.spamalot.noorg Two is for differences between the text and the source I.e. text says www.banksecurity.com but source points to www.china.banksecurity.com The SCAM feature cannot be trained, it doesn't learn (the spam or junk mail feature can do both). When you mark a specific message as NOT A SCAM, then a header is added to that specific messsage (not to duplicates or others that are the same) so the scan is supressed when the message is opened again. Problem is, while the two things it scans for are used by phishing messages, they are also used by legitimate newsletters as well, and evidently, the Seattle Times Newsletter is one of them. The only control you have over the SCAM feature is to turn it off. Thats it. Many people turn it off. [Tools-->Options]*-->Privacy [Email Scams] Uncheck [] Tell me if the email message I'm reading is a suspected email scam *varies by OS Linux [Edit-->Preferences] Mac [Thunderbird-->Preferences] Windows as above |
|
|||
|
Re: Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
Tjamks ron andMoz Champion (Dan) wrote:
> LuDean Marvin wrote: >> Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets >> flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). I've >> added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to display >> images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen or so >> newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that gets >> flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have some >> other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it >> deserves? > > > > The SCAM feature is another simple thing > > > Everytime a message is opened (Yes Virginia, every time) the message is > scanned for two things > > One is for numeric IPs instead of 'language' ones > i.e. 12.123.123.12 instead of www.spamalot.noorg > Two is for differences between the text and the source > I.e. text says www.banksecurity.com but source points to > www.china.banksecurity.com > > > The SCAM feature cannot be trained, it doesn't learn (the spam or junk > mail feature can do both). > > > When you mark a specific message as NOT A SCAM, then a header is added > to that specific messsage (not to duplicates or others that are the > same) so the scan is supressed when the message is opened again. > > Problem is, while the two things it scans for are used by phishing > messages, they are also used by legitimate newsletters as well, and > evidently, the Seattle Times Newsletter is one of them. > > > The only control you have over the SCAM feature is to turn it off. Thats > it. > Many people turn it off. Thjanks Ron & Moz for your prompt responses. It wasn't what I had hoped to here, but I now know that turning it off is the best solution. Thanks again,.. Sincerely, LuDean > > [Tools-->Options]*-->Privacy [Email Scams] > > Uncheck > [] Tell me if the email message I'm reading is a suspected email scam > > > *varies by OS > Linux > [Edit-->Preferences] > Mac > [Thunderbird-->Preferences] > Windows as above |
|
|||
|
Re: Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
> LuDean Marvin wrote: >> Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets >> flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). I've >> added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to display >> images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen or so >> newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that gets >> flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have some >> other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it >> deserves? > > > > The SCAM feature is another simple thing > > > Everytime a message is opened (Yes Virginia, every time) the message is > scanned for two things > > One is for numeric IPs instead of 'language' ones > i.e. 12.123.123.12 instead of www.spamalot.noorg > Two is for differences between the text and the source > I.e. text says www.banksecurity.com but source points to > www.china.banksecurity.com > > > The SCAM feature cannot be trained, it doesn't learn (the spam or junk > mail feature can do both). > > > When you mark a specific message as NOT A SCAM, then a header is added > to that specific messsage (not to duplicates or others that are the > same) so the scan is supressed when the message is opened again. > > Problem is, while the two things it scans for are used by phishing > messages, they are also used by legitimate newsletters as well, and > evidently, the Seattle Times Newsletter is one of them. > > > The only control you have over the SCAM feature is to turn it off. Thats > it. > Many people turn it off. > > > [Tools-->Options]*-->Privacy [Email Scams] > > Uncheck > [] Tell me if the email message I'm reading is a suspected email scam > > > *varies by OS > Linux > [Edit-->Preferences] > Mac > [Thunderbird-->Preferences] > Windows as above Since the solutions always seems to be "turn it off", why the heck is it part of the product? -- The Frosted Flake +------------------------ SPAM is for eating ------------------------+ |
|
|||
|
Re: Seattle Times Newsletter flagged as "scam"
Frosted_Flake wrote:
> Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: >> LuDean Marvin wrote: >>> Every time my Seattle Times Newsletter appears in my inbox it gets >>> flagged as a possible scam by Thunderbird v.2.0.0.14 (20080421). >>> I've added it to my contacts list and have given it permission to >>> display images, but the problem still persists. I have a half dozen >>> or so newsletters from various sources and this is the only one that >>> gets flagged. Aside from turning the feature off, does anyone have >>> some other ideas on how I can get my newsletter the respectability it >>> deserves? >> >> >> >> The SCAM feature is another simple thing >> >> >> Everytime a message is opened (Yes Virginia, every time) the message >> is scanned for two things >> >> One is for numeric IPs instead of 'language' ones >> i.e. 12.123.123.12 instead of www.spamalot.noorg >> Two is for differences between the text and the source >> I.e. text says www.banksecurity.com but source points to >> www.china.banksecurity.com >> >> >> The SCAM feature cannot be trained, it doesn't learn (the spam or >> junk mail feature can do both). >> >> >> When you mark a specific message as NOT A SCAM, then a header is added >> to that specific messsage (not to duplicates or others that are the >> same) so the scan is supressed when the message is opened again. >> >> Problem is, while the two things it scans for are used by phishing >> messages, they are also used by legitimate newsletters as well, and >> evidently, the Seattle Times Newsletter is one of them. >> >> >> The only control you have over the SCAM feature is to turn it off. >> Thats it. >> Many people turn it off. >> >> >> [Tools-->Options]*-->Privacy [Email Scams] >> >> Uncheck >> [] Tell me if the email message I'm reading is a suspected email scam >> >> >> *varies by OS >> Linux >> [Edit-->Preferences] >> Mac >> [Thunderbird-->Preferences] >> Windows as above > Since the solutions always seems to be "turn it off", why the heck is it > part of the product? > > For the same reason pop-up blocking or tabs or favicons or many other features are there. It provides the user with a means of 'customizing' the product. It provides a starting point The two things it looks for are essentially hallmarks of phishing emails so it does provide some benefit for new users, it simply isn't 100% accurate because some legitimate newsletters use the same 'tricks' as well. Put it this way. If you didn't have a legitimate newsletter that it caught, then it would be rather good protection (tho not 100% of course). Essentially, it could catch upwards of 35% or so of the phishing emails sent your way, and if you didn't have the false positive, then why fix what ain't broke? It does catch a fair percentage of phishing emails (estimates vary between 35 and 60 percent), so it's better than nothing. If a developer could work it out, it could even be upgraded to a 'learning' system (sort of like Junk Mail Controls) but no-one seems to have a handy dandy algorythym for that yet. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|