![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
The issue is not pedophiles, or even profits, it's control ofcontent
The internet has allowed a lot of free thought to circle the planet and
most of this has been very good. Yes, it's allowed for a proliferation of hate, porn and other undesirable stuff, for certain. But, by and large, the net affect (pun intended), has been good. There has been a change. To my mind, a serious and quite scary one. It was brought to fruition by the New York Attorney General. How he made companies the size of Verizon and ATT, among others, get on board is beyond me. I don't know what the carrot or stick was, but it must have been pretty big! The change is that these companies will now determine what content you may see or read on the internet. Yes, I know. The stated goal was to make it harder for pedophiles, and yes, that is something I think all of us can agree with, but seriously, do you think dropping usenet access to the alt groups, or usenet access entirely is even going to slow these kinds of people down for a day? Of course not. I remember a couple of years ago when the web site for Sailing Anarchy got hacked and went down. Within 15 minutes, no exaggeration, alternate servers where set up by unaffiliated people, other than being visitors to the SA forums, and things went humming along as though nothing had happened until the main site could get back on line. If unprepared folks, can do this with little or no notice, don't you think the perverts were probably prepared with a backup plan? So maybe this kind of thing will help slow the Orwellianization of the 'net, I'm not sure. So now, your ISP wants to tell you that because .00001 % of the population, MIGHT be using one of the groups in the alt hierarchy for sick and perverted postings, you are denied access to a.b.windows.os, and every other group in that hierarchy that has nothing to do with child molestation. Using this logic, we should ban cars, because some people MIGHT drive drunk. Or alcohol, or pain relievers, or fill in the blank! Frankly, I see this as a power grab by the major ISP's. Never before have they passed judgment on what is going through their "pipes". I really think this is an extremely slippery slope. The scary part is that people don't seem to see the potential for abuse, they are just pissed they can't get their MP3's or whatever. Of course, the US congress critters have given the telcos immunity, so I guess anything is fair game now. How long before it becomes part of your ISP's TOS to have a "net nanny" watching your activity, with Uncle Sam's blessing? Will they even bother to tell you? Will people posting in MNID simply stop and we'll never know why, will we even notice? Cripes, I just had a flash back to Rollerball! |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|