![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Re: red hat linux
graham1949 wrote:
> Hi All > I am new to Linux and trying to install REd Hat Linux 3 & Ferora as > from the bible by Christopher Negus > the Istallation sftware does not find my hard drive and request a > driver. > The hard drive is Western Dig Corp WD2500JD, I have downloaded the > driver from their site and attempted to use the XP version as my Dell > is XP, to no avail. > System Dell 8400 running XP, Hard drive partioned to accomodate Linux. > Any helpwould be greatly appreciated > Graham Hello, What an OOOOOOOOPS! RH 3 is really out of date since last realease was RH 7 some years ago and the RH project became RHEnterpriseLinux (payware) and Fedora (ex Fedora Core). I'd recommend you to take a look at distrowatch .com and get any newest distro such as MDV2008.1, Debian 4.0r3, OpenSuSE 11.0. Fedora 9 is not good for noobs and X/K/Ubuntu sucks. BSD is a bit complicated but you can give them a try too. For older PI/PII combos with not much RAM, a light distro such as Damn Small Linux can do the job. Any combo better than a CeleronII with more than 256 MB RAM can easily run any modern distro under the Gnome desktop or KDE with no gimmick. Ciao + |
|
|||
|
Re: red hat linux
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, F8BOE wrote: > graham1949 wrote: > >> Hi All >> I am new to Linux and trying to install REd Hat Linux 3 & Ferora as >> from the bible by Christopher Negus >> the Istallation sftware does not find my hard drive and request a >> driver. >> The hard drive is Western Dig Corp WD2500JD, I have downloaded the >> driver from their site and attempted to use the XP version as my Dell >> is XP, to no avail. >> System Dell 8400 running XP, Hard drive partioned to accomodate Linux. >> Any helpwould be greatly appreciated >> Graham > > > Hello, > > What an OOOOOOOOPS! RH 3 is really out of date since last realease was RH 7 > some years ago and the RH project became RHEnterpriseLinux (payware) and > Fedora (ex Fedora Core). Please ignore this misleading and wrong information. Wrong: the last release of Red Hat before the "Enterprise" series was Red Hat 9 (not 7) and misleading because the original poster was probably referring to Red Hat Enterprise v.3 -- which is still supported and receives updates. Red Hat continues to update the kernel on RHEL 3, so support of newer hardware continues to expand. It does not have the same level of support of newer hardware that the newer releases have, but it should not be dismissed out of hand. Nevertheless, unless you have a specific reason to use RHEL3 (eg. some software that is only supported under RHEL3), I would not recommend it. |
|
|||
|
Re: red hat linux
Whoever wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, F8BOE wrote: > >> graham1949 wrote: .... >> Hello, >> >> What an OOOOOOOOPS! RH 3 is really out of date since last realease was >> RH 7 >> some years ago and the RH project became RHEnterpriseLinux (payware) and >> Fedora (ex Fedora Core). > > Please ignore this misleading and wrong information. > Wrong: the last release of Red Hat before the "Enterprise" series was > Red Hat 9 (not 7) and misleading because the original poster was > probably referring to Red Hat Enterprise v.3 -- which is still supported > and receives updates. Correcting your wrong information for just a second. While it is very true that Red Hat does say (now) that RHELAS 3 was their first "enterprise" product, that's really NOT true, for Red Hat did deliver RHAS 2.1 which WAS their first enterprise product (which they now deny) and it WAS indeed a Red Hat 7 "based" distribution. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|