![]() |
|
|
Welcome to the { mindfrost82.com } forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
Hi.
I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2 (also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process only allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow. I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything seems to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem. Please help! Ulf |
|
|||
|
Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
Hopefully the following helps, check their recommedations:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...hysdbstor.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...n/sqlops6.mspx "Ulf Dingler" <u.dingler@lasartes.de> wrote in message news:6fmabrFbskioU1@mid.uni-berlin.de... > Hi. > I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2 > (also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process > only allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow. > > I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything > seems to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem. > > Please help! > > Ulf |
|
|||
|
Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
Ulf Dingler (u.dingler@lasartes.de) writes:
> I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2 > (also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process > only allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow. > > I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything > seems to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem. What does "sp_configure 'max server memory'" report? And "sp_configure 'awe enabled'"? Have you check in Task Manager whether there is any other process that takes up a lot of memory? How big are your databases? -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx |
|
|||
|
Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
"Erland Sommarskog" <esquel@sommarskog.se> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Xns9AF0D6C2AFBYazorman@127.0.0.1... > What does "sp_configure 'max server memory'" report? And "sp_configure > 'awe enabled'"? > > Have you check in Task Manager whether there is any other process that > takes up a lot of memory? > awe is enabled but i read, that awe is not important for 64bit. sp_configure 'max server memory' reports 2147483647. no other process takes more than 60mb and there is a lot of memory free (10GB) for the sql server process. > How big are your databases? > the databases are very big. 7GB/9GB/70GB |
|
|||
|
Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
Ulf Dingler (u.dingler@lasartes.de) writes:
> awe is enabled but i read, that awe is not important for 64bit. That's correct. It's not supposed to have any effect at all, but it does affect something, although I don't recall exactly what. On 32-bit when you have AWE enabled, and look in task manager, you don't see the true size of SQL Server, as the AWE memory is not included. Maybe there is a similar effect on 64-bit? Could you run DBCC MEMORYSTATUS and post the output? > the databases are very big. 7GB/9GB/70GB Ehum, 70GB could be called mediums-sized, but it does not really qualify as "very big". Not that it matter here. Unless the data-access pattern is very concentrated, it seems unlikely that SQL Server would not need more memory than 100 MB. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx |
|
|||
|
Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System
Ulf Dingler wrote:
> I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2 > (also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process only > allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow. > > I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything seems > to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem. You can force SQL's memory usage by setting minimum and maximum to the same value (say 10 GB, leaving the other 2 GB for the other processes). |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|