Ok Big Al will do as you suggest many thanks for your info.

regards
normski
--
nski

normski wrote:
> Ok Big Al will do as you suggest many thanks for your info.
>
> regards
> normski

> THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE TO PUT THE REPLY



I think you misunderstood my suggestion.
When you reply, just put your reply 'below' the previous person. Not in
a new message all together.
See above. I put a string of text in caps 'inside your message'.
The string in caps looks like its part of your message and it isn't.
Its confusing to others. I think that is all I was trying to point out.
In most readers you see the vertical bars on the side of other posters
or you see > characters beside their text etc.
If you're not using a news reader like Outlook or Thunderbird or Agent,
you might want to try one of those. They are made to read and track
threads in a subject a bit better than other methods.

Good luck. No harm done.

--
nski


"Big Al" wrote:

> normski wrote:
> > Ok Big Al will do as you suggest many thanks for your info.
> >
> > regards
> > normski
>
> > THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE TO PUT THE REPLY
>
>
>
> I think you misunderstood my suggestion.
> When you reply, just put your reply 'below' the previous person. Not in
> a new message all together.
> See above. I put a string of text in caps 'inside your message'.
> The string in caps looks like its part of your message and it isn't.
> Its confusing to others. I think that is all I was trying to point out.
> In most readers you see the vertical bars on the side of other posters
> or you see > characters beside their text etc.
> If you're not using a news reader like Outlook or Thunderbird or Agent,
> you might want to try one of those. They are made to read and track
> threads in a subject a bit better than other methods.
>
> Good luck. No harm done.

> Hi big Al thank you for explaining how to reply correctly
regards
normski